Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1951No. 35,280PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying the motion of plaintiffs for a new trial.

Plaintiffs were employed as painters by the M. & M. Painters & Decorators (hereinafter called M. & M.), which had a contract with the A-B-C Corrugated Box Company (hereinafter called the box company) for the painting, among other things, of the steel girders in its warehouse. These girders were located about 24 feet above the cement floor of the warehouse, and in order that plaintiffs could reach these girders M. & M. rented a steel scaffold from defendant. The scaffold…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Abbett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  4. Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Schmanski v. Church of St. Casimir of WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API