State v. Saenz
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.
¶1 This case requires us to examine how our juvenile justice laws interact with the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW, also known as the “three strikes law.” When Jorge Saenz was 15 years old, he agreed to waive juvenile court jurisdiction and transfer his case to adult court, where he pleaded guilty to two counts of felony assault in exchange for a moderately lower sentencing recommendation. As a result, seven years later he faces life in prison without the possibility of parole under the POAA. We now examine whether his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Larry O. Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. S.J.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HamedianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. A. H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. D.j.m., L.d.m., & L.k.m.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.