Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 13, 2014No. 27489-6-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kulik, J. *

¶1 At 16 years of age, Stephen Bailey stipulated to a waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction and pleaded guilty to second degree robbery in adult court. The State later used this conviction as a “strike” under the Persistent Offender Accountability Act (POAA) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, chapter 9.94A RCW. In an unpublished decision, this court concluded that the transfer of Mr. Bailey’s case to adult court was proper and, therefore, the robbery conviction could be used as a strike under the POAA. State v. Bailey, noted at 157 Wn. App. 1026, 2010 WL 3034924, 2010 Wash. App.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Harbert v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington v. D.j.m., L.d.m., & L.k.m.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API