Legal Opinion

Specht v. Eastwood-Nealley Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 11, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 N.J. Super. 156 (1955)

111 A.2d 781

HARRY G. SPECHT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 24, 1955.

Decided February 11, 1955.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

This appeal raises a single issue. Did the trial court err…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Montgomery v. DennisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Stack v. P. G. Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodpasture v. GoodpastureNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Crinnion v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Miller v. Associated Pension Trusts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1975
  4. Johnson v. Hertz Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API