Legal Opinion
In re W. H.
New York City Family Court
Decided January 19, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1033OPINION OF THE COURT
Bruce M. Kaplan, J.
Respondent moved to dismiss this juvenile delinquency petition alleging that the respondent, as a member of the Flying Dragons youth gang, did acts which if done by an adult would constitute, inter alia, the charge of attempted grand larceny in the second degree. The grounds for dismissal center on an alleged failure to comply with the time requirements of Family Court Act § 340.1 that mandate that a juvenile must be brought to trial within 60 days of his or her initial appearance or within an additional 30 days upon motion of the presentment agency for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re Frank C.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Randy K.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Virginia E.E. v. Alberto S.P.New York City Family Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re E.F.New York City Family Court · 1994