Legal Opinion

Pajak v. Pajak

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1982PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gabrielli, J.

Subdivision (1) of section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law provides that a spouse may maintain an action for divorce on the ground of “[t]he cruel and inhuman treatment of the plaintiff by the defendant such that the conduct of the defendant so endangers the physical or mental well-being of the plaintiff as renders it unsafe or improper for the plaintiff to cohabit with the defendant.” The issue on this appeal is whether the defendant’s claimed mental illness may be asserted as a defense in an action of this nature.

The parties to this appeal were married in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Hoops v. HoopsNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Hartog v. HartogNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Brady v. BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API