Legal Opinion

Virginia E.E. v. Alberto S.P.

New York City Family Court

Decided April 8, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kevin C. Fogarty, J.

The sole issue before the court at this time is whether the court can order a human leucocyte antigen blood tissue test (hereinafter referred to as HLA blood test) in a custody proceeding on the motion of one of the parties.

The relevant facts in this controverted case are as follows. The petitioner mother instituted this proceeding against the respondent father for the purpose of reacquiring the custody of Kimberly, born May 20, 1974. The child has been living with the respondent since sometime in 1975 although the exact dates and the circumstances…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Hill v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Montelone v. AntiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Time v. TimeNew York City Family Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cuthbert S. v. Linda S.New York City Family Court · 1994
  2. Isabel M. v. Thomas M.New York City Family Court · 1995
  3. Lory v. LoryNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Warne v. WarneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. In re Amy Beth G.New York City Family Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API