Legal Opinion

State v. Thornton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 5, 1990No. CR88-179; CA A50359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant appeals his sentence, assigning as error the imposition of restitution of $275 for a stolen stereo. Defendant was convicted of theft for stealing cash and tires from the service station where he worked. A car stereo also disappeared that evening from a car parked at the station. Defendant was not charged with its theft, and he did not admit to stealing it.

Restitution may be imposed when a defendant’s criminal activities cause a pecuniary loss. ORS 137.106(1); State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 181, 637 P2d 602 (1981). ORS 137.103(1) defines “criminal activities” as

“any offense with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. State v. HazlittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. SigmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API