State v. Thornton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant appeals his sentence, assigning as error the imposition of restitution of $275 for a stolen stereo. Defendant was convicted of theft for stealing cash and tires from the service station where he worked. A car stereo also disappeared that evening from a car parked at the station. Defendant was not charged with its theft, and he did not admit to stealing it.
Restitution may be imposed when a defendant’s criminal activities cause a pecuniary loss. ORS 137.106(1); State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 181, 637 P2d 602 (1981). ORS 137.103(1) defines “criminal activities” as
“any offense with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. HazlittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. SigmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018