Legal Opinion

State v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2004No. 29237PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDEE, Justice.

John Doe (“Doe”), a juvenile, was charged with “Disrupting the Educational Process,” pursuant to Idaho Code Section 33 — 512(H). 1 Doe’s motion to dismiss was denied by the magistrate court and the district court affirmed. Doe challenges the constitutionality of Idaho Code Section 33-512(11) on the basis of over-breadth and vagueness.

i.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At the time of the incident giving rise to this case Doe was a ten-year-old elementary student attending the fourth grade. On March 14, 2001, he stood up in class and asked his substitute teacher for a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RhodeIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. State v. NICK R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. State v. GillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Statewide Construction, Inc. v. PietriIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. CottrellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API