Legal Opinion

West American Insurance v. California Mutual Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1987No. B024979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Two insurance companies, West American and California Mutual, sought a declaratory judgment assigning responsibility for defending and indemnifying the insured in a personal injury suit. The trial court determined that an employment exception in West American’s policy relieved it of any duty to defend or indemnify, but that a business pursuit exception in the California Mutual policy did not apply under the circumstances of the injury. California Mutual was therefore held to have the sole responsibility to defend and indemnify the insured.

California Mutual appeals, arguing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Legarra v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Therkildsen v. Fisher BeverageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Smyth v. USAA Property & Casualty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API