Legal Opinion

Eigenmann v. Backof

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Spencer Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint on a promissory note, made by the appellants to the appellee.

Answer: General denial.

Trial by the court; finding for the appellee; motion fora new trial overruled; exception; judgment; appeal. Assignments of error:

1st. Overruling the motion for a new trial; and,

2d. Insufficiency of the complaint.

Eb demurrer had been filed to the complaint. The ground alleged against it under the assignment is, that a copy of the note was not filed with it. This is true, although the complaint states that such copy was filed, and would have been good ground for a demurrer; but the defect is healed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh, & Cleveland Railroad v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Howorth v. ScarceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Russell v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Gander v. State ex rel. RasureIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railroad v. McCafferyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Owen School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Scott v. ZartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Toledo, Wabash & Western R. W. Co. v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hasseld v. SeyfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API