Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This was a suit for the partition of real estate. 'The appellant was the second wife and widow of John Russell, and had no child by him, and she was the plaintiff or petitioner below; and the appellees were the defendants below, and were the children of John Russell by a former wife. There was a partition of the real estate, setting off to the appellant one-third of the same in value for her life. Questions are sought to be raised and presented to this court as to the proceedings, but it is not pretended that one-third of the real estate in value was not set off to the appellant for life; and…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stone v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Coquillard v. CoquillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Whitten v. WhittenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Shaw v. BeersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API