Legal Opinion

United States v. Atwood

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1982No. Cr. 82-00095PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

In this criminal prosecution, the government has charged defendant Blake Atwood in a sixteen-count indictment with violating the United States Code’s prohibitions against mail fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1342; Counts 1-3, 12-16), making fraudulent statements or representations to government departments or agencies (18 U.S.C. § 1001; Counts 4-10), and knowingly transmitting a forged writing for the purpose of defrauding the United States (18 U.S.C. § 494; Count 11). Defendant, when the Vice-President of Damascus Hosiery Mills, Inc. (“Damascus”), a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Murray L. Petersen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. HaleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. United States v. BarrientosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CoffeeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. United States v. DonatoDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1994
  3. United States v. HurwitzDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1983
  4. United States v. OsterDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1984
  5. United States v. MenendezDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API