Legal Opinion

United States v. Hurwitz

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided October 21, 1983No. Crim. 83-20065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

On June 30, 1983, a grand jury returned the within fifteen-count indictment, wherein Count One alleges that from approximately the Spring of 1976 until the date of the indictment, that the Defendants, Hurwitz, Weitzen and Firestone, violated 18 U.S.C. § 371 by knowingly conspiring to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing and defeating the Internal Revenue Service’s ascertainment, computation, assessment, management and collection of income taxes. The indictment further charges Hurwitz 1 and Firestone, 2 both of whom then…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DonatoDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1994
  2. United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. United States v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  4. United States v. DeliaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. United States v. PercuocoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API