Legal Opinion
United States v. Haley
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 7, 1981No. Crim. 80-00071PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
American colonists, incensed by King George Ill’s disregard of their historic rights as Englishmen, justified the American Revolution by submitting “the Facts to a candid world” in the Declaration of Independence, in which they listed and decried “repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny”. One particularly offensive and universally detested practice included transportation “beyond [the] Seas to be tried for pretended offenses”. To protect citizens of the new nation from a similar abuse,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. CoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Clifford Jones v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, Judge of the United States District Court for Thedistrict of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Danny Mack MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. John E. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. McDadeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kawecki Berylco Industries, Inc. v. Fansteel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Perkins v. WagnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Karen Bags, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.