Lochwitz v. Pine Tree Mining & Milling Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by Adolpb Lochwitz and another against the Pine Tree Mining & Milling Company. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFkicx, J.
Tbe appellants brought this action against the respondent, a corporation, to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. In February, 1907, appellants and respondent entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that appellants ’should take possession of respondent’s mine and develop certain specified portions thereof by working a certain number of men for a specified time. ■ For all ores mined and sold appellants were to allow respondent a certain per cent., denominated “royalty.” As a part of the foregoing agreement, appellants were also given an option to purchase respondent’s mine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- First National Bank v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by11 opinions
- Western Securities Co. v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Carlquist v. QuayleUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Copper King Mining Co. v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1918
- Anderson v. Grantsville North Willow Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
- Aggeller & Musser Seed Co. v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.