Legal Opinion

United States v. Laurelli

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1960No. Cr. 12809, 12877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.

Defendant, found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 201, § 1621, 1 moves for judgment of acquittal or a new trial, asserting the verdict was against the evidence, the weight of the evidence, the law, and the charge of the court, reserving the right to file additional reasons after the transcript of testimony was filed. No request was made to or extension allowed by the court as required by Rule 45(b), F.R.Crim.P. 18 U.S.C.A.

Thereafter defendant asserted error in the denial of his pretrial motion for a continuance; 2 error in the conduct of the trial, in rulings on…

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. United States v. Anthony Dennis RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. AlaimoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. United States v. MathewsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API