United States v. Laurelli
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
Defendant, found guilty of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 201, § 1621, 1 moves for judgment of acquittal or a new trial, asserting the verdict was against the evidence, the weight of the evidence, the law, and the charge of the court, reserving the right to file additional reasons after the transcript of testimony was filed. No request was made to or extension allowed by the court as required by Rule 45(b), F.R.Crim.P. 18 U.S.C.A.
Thereafter defendant asserted error in the denial of his pretrial motion for a continuance; 2 error in the conduct of the trial, in rulings on…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- United States v. Anthony Dennis RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- United States v. AlaimoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- United States v. MathewsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.