Legal Opinion

LaBelle v. Blake

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 30, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] David and Suzanne Blake appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Calkins, J.) declaring that they are not entitled to use a right-of-way which crosses property owned by their neighbors, Richard and Lois LaBelle. The Blakes argue, inter alia, that the court erred by determining that the LaBelles’ predecessor-in-interest did not reserve an easement appurtenant for the benefit of the Blake property. We affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In the early 1970s Paris Mosher (“Paris”) owned two parcels of adjacent property near Great Pond in Rome, Maine. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Morrell v. RiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. LeMay v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Bangert v. Osceola CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Molk v. MicklewrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beverly A. Gravison v. Calvert M. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. Connolly v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Richard P. French v. Estate of Martha GutzanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Beverly A. Gravison v. Calvert M. FisherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API