Legal Opinion

State v. Barrie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 15, 2009No. 054612FE; A135053PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

This case presents the question of whether a trial court, sitting as trier of fact, may, sua sponte, convict a defendant of a lesser-included offense after first acquitting the defendant of the greater charge where (1) neither party had requested that the lesser-included offense be considered; (2) the prosecutor had expressly eschewed pursuit of the lesser-included offense; and (3) the record demonstrates that defendant had no actual notice of the court’s consideration of the lesser-included offense before the court rendered its oral verdict. We hold that, under those specific circumstances,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. GibbonsOregon Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. ArneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API