State v. Duvall
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree failure to appear. ORS 162.195. He argues that the state did not prove the allegations of the information by which he was charged. The information alleged that defendant was released from “custody,” when in fact he had been released from a correctional facility. The state acknowledges that it proved facts different from what it alleged, but argues that the variance is not material or prejudicial. Defendant argues that, under the relevant case law, the variance is material. We agree with the state and affirm.
The relevant facts are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ArneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. McCOINCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004