Legal Opinion
Berrigan v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 29, 1982No. Civ. A. CA 82-1553-ZPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZOBEL, District Judge.
This is an action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, against Greyhound Lines, Inc. (“Greyhound”) and the Amalgamated Council of Greyhound Local Unions (the “Council”). Four plaintiffs, purporting to represent a class of 300 schoolteachers working as drivers for the bus company in the summer and their vacation period, allege that Greyhound has breached its collective bar gaining agreement with them by no longer giving them the same benefits as full-time employees. The complaint also states that the Council has…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Garrett Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Workgroup Technology Corp. v. MGM Grand Hotel, LLC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Shipley Co., Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Princess House, Inc. v. LindseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Brant Point Corp. v. PoetzschDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Boateng v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.