Legal Opinion

Shipley Co., Inc. v. Clark

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 16, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2609-TPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Shipley Company, Inc. (“Ship-ley”), is a Massachusetts corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of specialty chemical products. Shipley hired defendants Clark and Nolan, both Michigan residents, to work in its Michigan office as account managers and salesmen.

Shortly after Clark and Nolan commenced their employment in 1977 and 1978, respectively, Shipley presented them with new employment contracts containing two restrictive covenants that are at the heart of this case. The first provided that, for one year after their termination, defen dants…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Manufacturers Consolidation Service, Inc. v. RodellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Ferrofluidics Corporation v. Advanced Vacuum Components, inc.s.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials, LLC v. Electronic Circuits Supplies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Estee Lauder Companies Inc. v. BatraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Optos, Inc. v. TOPCON MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API