Legal Opinion

Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1925No. 671PublishedCited by 152 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This is a suit for damages for the effect of an alleged conspiracy of the defendants unlawfully to restrain and prevent plaintiffs’ interstate trade in coal in violation of the first and second sections of the Federal Anti-Trust Act. The charge is that the defendants, in 1914, for the purpose of consummating the conspiracy, destroyed valuable mining properties of the plaintiffs. Treble damages and an attorney’s fee are asked under the seventh section of the Act. The suit was brought in the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. The. plaintiffs are the Bache-Denman Coal Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United Leather Workers International Union, Local Lodge or Union No. 66 v. Herkert & Meisel Trunk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  4. Dowd v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by152 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API