Legal Opinion

Spier v. Hyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Charles L. Hyde and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 3d day of July, 1903, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, directing an accounting by the defendants of certain stocks.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

There was a former appeal in this case from an interlocutory judgment entered therein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, and lipón such appeal the judgment was reversed (78 App. Div. 151). In the "opinion there written the substance of the pleadings forming the issue between the parties was stated, and also the principal contracts relied upon by the parties were set out in full in their pleadings, and considered by the court in making disposition of the appeal. It is not necessary, therefore, that the issues be stated herein in detail, or that the contracts be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Spier v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lind v. WebberNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Hardin v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Reynolds v. SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API