Legal Opinion

Brouwer v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1933No. Docket No. 8874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

The petition in the proceeding alleges that petitioners are husband and wife, that R. L. Butcher, incorrectly named as a respondent, was plaintiff in respondent court in an action in which petitioners were defendants, that Sally Williams, also incorrectly named as a respondent, was the assignee from Butcher of a judgment rendered in the action, that E. W. Biscailuz, also improperly named as a respondent, is sheriff, as stated in the title of the proceeding, that Butcher, under three counts on contract, commenced an action against petitioner in respondent court, that on a certain date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brazil v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Williams v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. In re William E. De Lany & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Haynes v. Thrift Credit UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Franz v. ListugMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API