Brouwer v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.
The petition in the proceeding alleges that petitioners are husband and wife, that R. L. Butcher, incorrectly named as a respondent, was plaintiff in respondent court in an action in which petitioners were defendants, that Sally Williams, also incorrectly named as a respondent, was the assignee from Butcher of a judgment rendered in the action, that E. W. Biscailuz, also improperly named as a respondent, is sheriff, as stated in the title of the proceeding, that Butcher, under three counts on contract, commenced an action against petitioner in respondent court, that on a certain date…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brazil v. AzevedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Williams v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Woods v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- In re William E. De Lany & Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1903
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Haynes v. Thrift Credit UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
- Franz v. ListugMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Probate CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 1959