Legal Opinion

Brazil v. Azevedo

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1916No. Civ. No. 1852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This action was brought against Manuel Azevedo, John S. Marshall, J. Rodgers and Melrose Central Creamery, the latter being a copartnership consisting of the three individual defendants named, and was for the recovery of the value of merchandise sold by the plaintiff to said copartnership, and also for the recovery of various amounts due other creditors and which had been assigned to the plaintiff.

After trial, judgment went in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant Manuel Azevedo, it having appeared by the answer of Azevedo’s codefendants—and which was admitted to be true by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bindsell v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Engelberg v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. DeMartini v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Smith v. PhlegarArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re CrockettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API