Legal Opinion

In re William E. De Lany & Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. This is a motion to continue an injunction granted by R. A. Gunnison, referee in bankruptcy, September 8, 1902, restraining Robert S.'Parsons, as county judge of Broome county, N. Y., the Lippincott Glass Company, and their attorneys, from taking further action on an order to show cause, granted by said county judge, why the said Daisy A. De Lany should not be punished for contempt in not obeying an order to appear and be examined in supplementary proceedings…

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. This is a motion to continue an injunction granted by R. A. Gunnison, referee in bankruptcy, September 8, 1902, restraining Robert S.'Parsons, as county judge of Broome county, N. Y., the Lippincott Glass Company, and their attorneys, from taking further action on an order to show cause, granted by said county judge, why the said Daisy A. De Lany should not be punished for contempt in not obeying an order to appear and be examined in supplementary proceedings in an action in the county court of said county granted on the return nulla bona of an execution issued thereon.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

On the 2d day of August, 1902, said Daisy A. De Rany was duly adjudged a bankrupt under and pursuant to the provisions of the national bankruptcy'law. 'One of the claims *281scheduled was that of $32.28 in favor of the Lippincott Glass Company against said Daisy A.' De Lany, being the amount of a judgment in favor of said company obtained in the city court of the city of Binghamton, Broome county, N. Y., on the 16th day of August, 1901. Pursuant to the laws of the state of New York a transcript was filed, and said judgment docketed in the clerk’s office of the county of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brouwer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. In re KepecsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
  3. In re Penn Development Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API