Legal Opinion
Mountain View Sports Center, Inc. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1979No. 3593PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
The major question presented by this appeal is whether the superior court erred in granting summary judgment against appellant Mountain View on the theory that it was not entitled to relief against any of the appellees. The rationale for the superior court’s ruling is that the insured, Mountain View, failed to comply with specific fire insurance policy provisions which required it to make periodic reports as to the amount of its inventory on hand. Thus, both the insurance broker and his agency, as well as the insurance company, were held not liable for any loss…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Alaska Foods, Inc. v. American Manufacturer's Mutual Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Washington National Insurance v. CraddockTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Six L'S Packing Co. v. Florida Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Milne v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- The Catts Company, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- The Catts Company, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983