Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Catts Company, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Gulf Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1983No. 81-1711Published

1DissentMcKAY, Circuit Judge

This is a case in which the trial court granted a directed verdict. If there were any issues of fact, that verdict cannot stand. The issues are only two: (1) whether the policy of insurance covers the kind of interest the plaintiff had in the steel at issue; and (2)'whether there was evidence from which the jury could have concluded that the company waived the requirement for monthly listing of inventories. Since I read the law and facts as requiring affirmative answers to both questions, I must respectfully dissent.

Coverage — The district court held that the policy did not cover the steel at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. BurdineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. Hanover Insurance Company v. McLoneyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1962
  4. O'DELL v. Kunkel's, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Stan-Ann Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API