People v. M.G.S.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRUCKER, J. pro tem.*
This is an appeal by M.G.S., a minor, from a judgment of the juvenile court declaring him to be a ward of the court, and from the order committing him to the youth authority. The primary contention of the appellant is that he was deprived of his constitutional right to effective aid of counsel, in that, his attorney failed to offer into evidence psychiatric reports to show that at the time of the commission of the felony offenses alleged in the petition, he was legally insane, and that the court erred in accepting an admission from the minor’s counsel.
M.G.S. came before…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- In Re ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re Matter of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
- James H. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Fare v. Ramon M.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. Javier A.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Keith H. v. Long Beach Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.