In Re Detachment of Unplatted Lands From Owatonna
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The Clinton Falls Nursery Company and others petitioned the district court that certain lands be detached from the city of Owatonna pursuant to the provisions of. L. 1927, p. 193, c. 122, 1 Mason, 1927, § 1726-6, et seq. The petition was denied, and the petitioners appeal from an order denying, their motion for a new trial.
The statute under which the proceeding is brought provides for the separation of unplatted agricultural or horticultural lands included in the corporate limits of cities containing 30,000 inhabitants or less and from school districts contained in such cities and for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunter v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kramer v. County of RenvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Taggart v. ClaypoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Lenox Land Co. v. City of OakdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Wertz v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PRR CO. v. LinehanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Ross v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Ross v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- City of Rochester v. Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Trustees of Bazetta Township v. City of WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.