Lenox Land Co. v. City of Oakdale
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 09. — SUIT BY LENOX LAND COMPANY AND BY THE NEW LOUISVILLE JOCKEY CLUB AGAINST THE CITY OF OAKDALE. — Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division). Samuel B. Kirby, Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.—
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Carroll.
— Affirming.
*485These two appeals involving the same questions will be disposed of together.
Oakdale is a city of the fifth class. Section 3611, Ky. St., a part of the charter of fifth-class cities, provides that: “Whenever it is deemed desirable to annex any territory to any city of this class, or to reduce the boundaries thereof, the city council thereof may enact an ordinance defining accurately the boundary of the territory proposed to be annexed or stricken off, and such ordinance shall thereupon be published in at least ten issues of the daily paper…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carrithers v. City of ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Lewis v. Town of BrandenburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- City of Bardstown v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Miller v. City of PinevilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
3Cited by15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pan American Production Co. v. City of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Jordan v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Masonic Widows & Orphans Home & Infirmary v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- In Re the Appeal of the City of LenexaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- City of Louisville v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.