Legal Opinion
City of Rochester v. Peoples Cooperative Power Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 1993No. Nos. C8-93-19, C4-93-20, CX-3-37, C3-93-39, C7-93-75PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from a district court order authorizing the City of Rochester to acquire, *623-by “quick-take,” certain electric service rights previously assigned by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to Peoples Cooperative Power Association. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1971, the Minnesota legislature approved special legislation authorizing any city within a joint sewer district in Olmsted County to annex, by ordinance, part or all of the joint district. 1971 Minn.Laws ch. 916, § 26, amended by 1973 Minn.Laws ch. 88, § 1. In April 1973, a joint sewer district known as the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. United States of America, Inland Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City Of Stilwell, Oklahoma v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- City of Stilwell v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Rochester v. PEOPLES CO-OP. POWER ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993