Legal Opinion

Lidgerwood v. Hale & Kilburn Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 6, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings. The ease presents the interesting question whether the holder of a promissory note may maintain a suit against the maker after maturity and nonpayment, where the note recites that it is subject to the terms of an indenture and where the indenture provides that no noteholder shall bring suit to' enforce the note unless the trustee under the indenture shall fail to bring suit after being requested to do so by the holders of a specified percentage of the outstanding notes, this condition not having been fulfilled. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Industrial General Trust, Ltd. v. . TodNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Herrington v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  2. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Siemens & Halske AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  3. In Re International Match CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  4. Scott v. PlattOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Quadrant Structured Products Co. v. VertinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API