Herrington v. Thompson
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
The motion to dismiss in the above matter raises the sole question of venue. Jurisdiction is not involved. This court has acquired, through due process, jurisdiction of both the subject matter and the parties. The question of venue arises because of an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant entered into first on July 5, 1944 and repeated August 1, 1944, September 1, 1944, and October 1, 1944. The basis of such an agreement is the fact that the plaintiff, as an employee of the defendant, suffered an injury on April 16, 1944, “while switching in the West…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MixSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Clark v. LowdenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- Lidgerwood v. Hale & Kilburn CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
- Harbis v. the Cudahy Packing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Krenger v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Petersen v. Ogden Union Railway & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
- Sherman v. Pere Marquette Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
- Akerly v. New York Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.