Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
At Law. Action by John L. Crosthwaite against the Moline Plow Company, now known as the Illinois American Plow Company. On plaintiff’s motions for judgment on pleadings, and defendant’s motion ■to dismiss complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
WINSLOW, District Judge.
There are two motions before the' court. The plaintiff moves for judgment on the pleadings, and the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. The complaint and the moving affidavits show that the plaintiff is the owner of five 7-per cent, serial gold notes, series D, for $1,000 each, issued'by the Moline Plow *467Company, and payable to bearer; that the notes matured on September 1, 1922, and that the principal and interest thereon have not been paid, although duly demanded. The answer admits the issuance of the notes, ownership by the plaintiff, and nonpayment at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- McClure v. Township of OxfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McClelland v. . Norfolk Southern R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Babbitt v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Allan v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Home Mortg. Co. v. RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Chicago District Electric Generating Corp. v. EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.