Legal Opinion
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Siemens & Halske Aktiengesellschaft
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The motion is by the plaintiff for partial summary judgment under rule 114 of the New York Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiff is trustee for bondholders under a trust indenture securing bonds issued by the defendants, corporations under the laws of Germany. It seeks to recover judgment at law for the principal, premium, and interest on bonds now overdue and unpaid. By concession of the defendants, the amounts overdue and unpaid are $964,-500 in principal, $19,290 in premium, and certain amounts of interest. The defendants’ points are that certain recent laws of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Canada Southern Railway Co. v. GebhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- New York Life Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Zimmermann v. Sutherland, Alien Property CustodianSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Allan v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Crosthwaite v. Moline Plow Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- David v. Veitscher Magnesitwerke Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- In Re the Arbitration Between Sea Dragon, Inc. & Gebr. Van Weelde Scheepvaartkantoor B.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Pan American Securities Corp. v. Fried, Krupp AktiengesellschaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Egyes v. Magyar Nemzeti BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.