Legal Opinion

Zumas v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 6, 1995No. Civ. K-95-3382PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.

In the within case, defendant has filed a notice of removal, and plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand to state court. For the following reasons, this Court has granted plaintiffs’ motion.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs Nick Zumas, et al., filed the within case in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, on November 4, 1994. 1 Originally, 31 parties were named as defen dants, including Owens-Coming, the single remaining defendant in the within case as of the time of removal to this Court on November 8,1995. In accordance with the accepted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greer v. SkilcraftDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
  2. Mark Barnes v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Saunders v. Wire Rope Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  4. Rezendes v. Dow Corning Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 1989
  5. Kite v. Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  2. De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  3. Barnett v. Sylacauga AutoplexDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1997
  4. McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  5. Riverdale Baptist Church v. Certainteed Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API