Barnett v. Sylacauga Autoplex
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
PROPST, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on to be heard on plaintiff’s motion for remand filed on May 20, 1997.' In her motion, the plaintiff argues that exercise of jurisdiction over the instant case is improper because (1) Chrysler Financial Corporation’s removal of her case was premised upon diversity of citizenship and, therefore, came outside of the one-year time limitation on removal stated in 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) and (2) no complete diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) exists between the plaintiff (and the prospective class she represents) and one…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jerry Palmer v. Hospital Authority Of Randolph CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Hernandez v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Caudill v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.