Legal Opinion

Greer v. Skilcraft

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 31, 1989No. CV 88-P-2152-S, CV 88-P-2188-S, CV 88-P-2192-SPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POINTER, Chief Judge.

More than 150 civil actions were removed to this court on December 15, 16, and 19, 1988. Most were cases with fictitious parties that had been pending in state court for months or even years, and were being removed on the basis of Section 1016 of the Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act, P.L. 100-702 (the “Act”). This flurry of activity resulted from the defendants’ belief that this Section — which in part provides that the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names is to be disregarded for purposes of removal — became effective on November…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. In re Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. Corinthia Louise Wilson v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Mark Barnes v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API