Legal Opinion

W. P. Nicholls v. Mapes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1905No. 37PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an action to recover the value of certain six head of cows alleged to have been wrongfully converted by defendant on April 26, 1901, at the county of Lassen. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiff had judgment for the value of the cattle with interest from the date of conversion, and for twenty-five dollars "as compensation for the time and money expended by plaintiff in the pursuit of the property. ’ ’ Defendant appeals from the judgment on bill of exceptions.

The court found as facts: That plaintiff is a copartnership, doing business as bankers in the town of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hays v. WindsorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Loomis v. BarkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Packard v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gladstone v. HillelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API