Legal Opinion
Chicago Forging & Mfg. Co. v. Bade-Cummins Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1933No. 6093, 6094PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The appeals involve validity and infringement of claim 17 of Gilmore patent No. 1,-581,485, for hood latches for automobiles, issued April 20, 1926. From a decree holding claim 17 valid, hut not infringed, both litigants appeal; the plaintiff below from that portion of the decree which held the claim not infringed, and the defendant below from that portion of the decree which held the claim valid. The parties will be referred to by the designations they bqre in the District Court.
-The hood latch is a small but essential part of an automobile. Its purpose is not only to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc. v. William T. Graham. William T. Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Dillon Pulley Co. v. McEachranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Mills Novelty Co. v. Monarch Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Ideal Roller & Mfg. Co. v. Sutherland Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.