Legal Opinion
Ideal Roller & Mfg. Co. v. Sutherland Paper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1938No. Nos. 7391, 7392PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The patentee owner and his licensees brought suit for injunction and to recover damages for infringement of patent No. 1,594,356, issued on August 3, 1926, to Arthur B. Davis. The patent discloses an inking roll and method of and apparatus for treating ink-rolls of printing presses, its main purpose being that surfaces of such rolls may be renewed. The Sutherland Paper Company is the user of the three *676machines charged to infringe, which were manufactured' and supplied by Samuel Bingham’s Son Manufacturing Company. -
The patent contains seven claims, three of which are for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Dunn Wire-Cut Lug Brick Co. v. Toronto Fire Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- France Mfg. Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Allen-Bradley Co. v. Erie Resistor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.