Legal Opinion
Villars v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 26, 2016No. 13-363CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rule 12(b)(1), Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 12(b)(6), Failure to State a Claim; Rule 66, Summary Judgment; Implied-In-Fact Contract; Actual Authority; Ratification.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRIGGSBY, Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
In this ease, plaintiff, Julio Villars, alleges that the United States has breached an implied-in-fact contract to provide him with certain compensation, protection and judicial assistance in connection with his service as a confidential human source for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”). The government has moved to dismiss this matter for lack of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Snyder & Associates Aquisitions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- 6601 Dorcheser Investment Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Panther Brands, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Rma Engineering S.A.R.L v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018