Legal Opinion
Fisher v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 26, 2016No. 15-1575CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to Dismiss; Conditions Subsequent; Illegal Exaction; Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WHEELER, Judge.
This case is a putative class action against the Government that involves the Public Access to Court Records (“PACER”) system. Plaintiff Bryndon Fisher alleges that PACER overcharges users because of a faulty pricing formula. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), he seeks to represent a proposed class of PACER users who have been similarly overcharged.'
The Government moved to dismiss Fisher’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Mapes v. PACERDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016