Legal Opinion

United States v. Ali

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 6, 1991No. Cr. A. 89-00112-R/C-01PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MICHAEL, District Judge.

The matter presently before the Court is Jamal Issa Ali’s motion for naturalization. All concerned parties have submitted legal memoranda on this matter, and it is, therefore, ripe for resolution. Before turning to the body of this Memorandum Opinion, however, the Court will make a few comments that will be later expanded.

This Memorandum Opinion brings to a close a case that has proved very distressful to this Court. The Court has been troubled by the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (hereinafter “INS's”) participation in the present case, but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Shomberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Eleuteri v. FurmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Petition for Naturalization of Marko TerzichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  5. Application of MartiniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ngwana v. Attorney General of USDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  2. Apokarina v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Apokarina v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. Dilone v. NielsenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  5. Mendonca v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API