Apokarina v. Atty Gen USA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case was initially straightforward. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1429, the Attorney General of the United States may not consider naturalization applications of aliens against whom removal proceedings are pending. We were asked to decide whether a district court has jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1421(c) to review the denial of a naturalization application when that denial is based on § 1429 (i.e., there was, apparently, a pending removal proceeding at the time the naturalization application was denied).
At oral argument, however, it came to our attention that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- CRUZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
- Petition for Naturalization of Marko TerzichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Gatcliffe v. RenoDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1998
- Mosleh v. StrappDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- United States v. AliDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of HomeLand SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Ajlani v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Dalal Zayed v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Amado De Lara Bellajaro v. Thomas J. Schiltgen, District Director of the Ins, Los Angeles District Office Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Perriello v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.