Legal Opinion
Bruhn v. STP Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 1, 1970No. Civ. A. No. C-1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
This action is brought by 11 named plaintiffs who seek a declaratory judgment that the noncompetition clauses in their contracts with defendant are invalid. Defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiffs’ complaint fails to reveal the existence of a “case or controversy” within the meaning of Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Both parties have fully briefed the issues presented by defendant’s motion and they are now ready for resolution.
Plaintiffs’ original complaint alleged…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Whitmore v. Salt Lake CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Proler Steel Corp. v. Luria Brothers & Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monroe v. HorwitchDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Johnson v. LallyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. BlumeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- CONSOL. RAIL CORP., ETC. v. Penn Central Corp.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982
- Bancard Services, Inc. v. E Trade Access, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.