Legal Opinion

State v. Colonese

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 7, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The defendant moved to strike out sixteen paragraphs of the finding and the denial of the motion by the trial court is assigned as error. All these paragraphs were statements of what the State had offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved.

We have heretofore called attention to the distinction between a finding on a trial to the jury and one where the case was tried to the court. The latter embodies the ultimate facts which have been determined by the court, while the former is merely a fair statement of what the parties offered evidence to prove and claimed to have proved. We also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. State v. BrauneisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  4. State v. BuxtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. State v. CariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API