Delfino v. Warners Motor Express
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have' been caused by the negligence of the defendant, acting through its agents and servants. The case was-tried to a jury. Judgment was rendered upon a. verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff, in and by nine of his assignments of error, seeks to have twelve corrections made to the' finding. The finding in a case tried to the jury is-merely a narrative of the facts claimed to have been proved on either side, made for the purpose of fairly-presenting any claimed errors in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Borucki v. MacKenzie Brothers Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Meglio v. ComeauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Schmeltz v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Petrillo v. KolbaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MastropetreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. NemethSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. VinalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Fairbanks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.